![]() Now you can enter a name for each face by double-clicking on a face or by selecting a face. On the left, you can see all face areas recognized by XnView. Not for fastrawviewer, it actually shows the real raw file. If your image file hasnt got already XMP MWG metadata, XnView will start and recognize areas with faces. Aside from the rich file format support, its equipped with powerful photo management and editing features that can. Of course the thumbnails use the embedded jpg, but I think that applies to most image tools. Contrary to what its name suggests, XnView is beyond a simple image viewer. Please see screenshot for settings for RAW image handling - hope this helps. It also does a different conversion than was done by the camera so don't be surprised if the resulting JPG looks different from the out of camera JPG even if you don't tell Batch Convert to make any changes. XnConvert is Multilingual, it includes more than 20 different translations. The Batch Convert tool does let you change the image size and even appearance so it is a useful tool for use with RAW images. XnConvert is Multi-platform, it is available for Windows, Mac, and Linux for both 32-bit and 64-bit editions. As far as I can tell the only thing FastStone can actually do to a RAW file is to use the Batch Convert Tool to convert it into a JPG. I have tried various things, including reading the manual. If you select a RAW file and edit it you are actually editing the embedded JPG. schools, universities, public authorities, police, fire brigade, and hospitals). XnView is provided as FREEWARE for private (not company) or educational use, including non-profit organizations (i.e. If you are a company, please visit the price list. I would like to know how you are editing the RAW file in FastStone. We would appreciate your help to continue the development. ![]() ![]() You do need to adjust the RAW settings to get past working on the embedded jpeg - but TBH I have only used that very occasionally. I am a long time user of FastStone and find that for both RAW and JPEG editing it provides 99.9% of all my needs. It’s all very well snapping away thousands of photos and tucking them away on a hard disk because you’ll use them one day, but months or even years later and it can. How do Faststone and XnViewMP compare from a feature and performance standpoint? (Image credit: Adobe) The best photo organizing software can whip your workflow into shape in no time, and heres why. I often hear that XnViewMP would be a better match for my needs. Works well for me, except that while it is "color aware", it is not "color managed". ![]() I've been a long time Faststone user - mostly for quick viewing and image culling - less so for editing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |